翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Thompson Township, Pennsylvania ・ Thompson Township, Seneca County, Ohio ・ Thompson Township, Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania ・ Thompson Transit ・ Thompson transitivity theorem ・ Thompson Trophy ・ Thompson Twins ・ Thompson Twins discography ・ Thompson uniqueness theorem ・ Thompson Usiyan ・ Thompson v Foy ・ Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Rly Co ・ Thompson v Park ・ Thompson v T Lohan (Plant Hire) Ltd ・ Thompson v Vincent ・ Thompson v. City of Louisville ・ Thompson v. Johnson County Community College ・ Thompson v. Keohane ・ Thompson v. Oklahoma ・ Thompson v. Washington ・ Thompson Valley High School ・ Thompson Valley, Virginia ・ Thompson W. McNeely ・ Thompson Water ・ Thompson Water Aerodrome ・ Thompson Weeks ・ Thompson Yates and Johnston Laboratories Report ・ Thompson's Bottom ・ Thompson's Bridge ・ Thompson's Bromine and Arsenic Springs Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Thompson v. City of Louisville ： ウィキペディア英語版 Thompson v. City of Louisville ''Thompson v. City of Louisville'', 362 U.S. 199 (1960), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court unanimously held that it is a violation of due process to convict a person of an offense when there is no evidence of his guilt. It is one of the rare instances of the Supreme Court's granting ''certiorari'' to review a decision of a court so insignificant (the Police Court of Louisville, Kentucky) that state law does not provide any mechanism for appeals from its judgments.〔As explained during oral argument, Kentucky provides no appellate review of Police Court cases when the fine is less than $20. The fine here was $10, but it was one of a long series of similar fines. According to counsel for Thompson, as stated in (oral argument ), this reflected a police vendetta against Thompson for perceived uppitiness.〕 The case is sometimes referred to as the "Shuffling Sam" case, because the petitioner Sam Thompson was known locally as "Shuffling Sam."〔See (Lewiston Daily Sun ), ''High Court Backs Shufflin' Sam'' (Mar 22, 1960).〕 The Court noted, "There is no evidence that anyone else in the cafe objected to petitioner's shuffling his feet in rhythm with the music of the jukebox."〔362 U.S. at 202. See also [https://books.google.com/books?isbn=1596520604 , p. 61.〕 Associate Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the court. The case was briefed and argued for Thompson by several notable former law clerks of justices of the Court.〔Louis Lusky argued the cause for petitioner. He had been law clerk for United States Supreme Court Justice Harlan F. Stone from 1937-38. With him on the brief were Harold Leventhal and Eugene Gressman. Leventhal was law clerk to U.S. Supreme Court Justices Harlan F. Stone from 1937-1938 and Stanley F. Reed in 1938, and later a federal court of appeals judge. Gressman was law clerk to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Frank Murphy from 1943-1948, and later was co-author of a leading treatise on Supreme Court practice and procedure, . See generally List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States.〕 == Background == 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Thompson v. City of Louisville」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.